|  
							GR9277 #85
			 | 
			
							
										
			 | 
		   
		  
			
			
					
		
		| 
		
		
			
			
			
		 | 
		 
		
		
			
			  			
			
				| 
				Alternate Solutions				 | 
			 
			
				
				
				unoriginal5279 2007-04-11 09:24:43 | When short on time (as I always am) I try to avoid calculations whenever possible. If you remember that E = m  c  + (p c)  then you already know that the momentum must be less than the energy, but greater than the difference between the energy and m c  . This eliminates all but the correct answer. |   |  Andresito 2006-03-29 15:15:31 | You could always use the general equation,
  
E^2 = (p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2
  
Solve for p having E = 3/2, and m*c^2 = 1/2
  
to obtain 1.4 as in (C).
											
											
											Andresito 2006-03-29 15:21:28 | 
										     The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											Andresito 2006-03-29 15:24:03 | 
										     The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
  |  
											 
										  |   |   
				 
				 | 
			 			
			 
  			
			
				| 
				Comments				 | 
			 
			
				
				
				EPdropout 2012-11-08 17:12:29 | I used T=p /2m=( -1)mc , after finding  =3 
=>p =2m*(2/3)E 
=>p =2.0 (MeV^2/c^2) 
=>p =1.4 MeV/c |   |  rrfan 2011-11-06 17:41:09 | A useful shortcut on these types of relativity problems: 
 
The solution to   is the following:  .  
 
Even if you don't memorize this, it is straightforward to derive and is often useful on multiple problems, saving some time on the algebra. |   |  dinoco 2010-11-07 07:52:37 | You say that "v=2c/3." But since  =8/9 then  
v should be 2 c/3  	 |   |  unoriginal5279 2007-04-11 09:24:43 | When short on time (as I always am) I try to avoid calculations whenever possible. If you remember that E = m  c  + (p c)  then you already know that the momentum must be less than the energy, but greater than the difference between the energy and m c  . This eliminates all but the correct answer.
											
											
											apr2010 2010-04-08 12:25:33 | 
										     Remarkable
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											thinkexist 2012-10-12 09:29:49 | 
										     This is actually so simple and brilliant I cannot believe I have not thought of this before. 
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											justin_l 2013-10-15 23:50:31 | 
										     if something is remarkably brilliant, would it not be more surprising that you *do* think of it?
  |  
											 
										  |   |  Andresito 2006-03-29 15:15:31 | You could always use the general equation,
  
E^2 = (p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2
  
Solve for p having E = 3/2, and m*c^2 = 1/2
  
to obtain 1.4 as in (C).
											
											
											Andresito 2006-03-29 15:21:28 | 
										     The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											Andresito 2006-03-29 15:24:03 | 
										     The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											ramparts 2009-08-06 22:54:12 | 
										     Well, it's better to use in problem 70, but I think it's pretty clear that for this question, the E^2 equation takes a lot less calculation than the "official" answer.
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											GREview 2009-08-30 19:22:53 | 
										     It may simplify things to not even think about the  's: 
 
  
 
Plugging   and  , we can solve for  .
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											Albert 2009-11-05 00:32:16 | 
										     Hey, I see what you did there, you used the c's in the denominator of the units right along side the values, smart work. Best solution!
  |  
											 
										  |   |   
				 
				 | 
			 			
			 
			
			
			
		 | 
		 
		 						
			 
			 | 
		   
		 
	 | 
    
	
	
  
    The Sidebar Chatbox... 
	Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... | 
   
  
    | 
		
	 | 
   
 
	
	
	
	
	 |