GREPhysics.NET: GR9277 #85

GR9277 #85

Problem

GREPhysics.NET Official Solution

\prob{85}
A free electron (rest mass $m_e-0.5MeV/c^2$ has a total energy of 1.5MeV. Its momentum p in units of MeV/c is about

0.86
1.0
1.4
1.5
2.0

Special Relativity $\Rightarrow$ }Momentum

Given a total energy of $\gamma mc^2 = 1.5MeV$ and the rest mass of the electron to be $m_e = .5MeV/c^2$ , one can figure out $\gamma =3$ .

The momentum is given by $p=\gamma mv = 3mv=3v/2 (MeV/c^2)$ .

Solve for the velocity from $\gamma= \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} \Rightarrow \gamma^2 = \frac{1}{1-\beta^2} \Rightarrow 1 = \gamma^2(1-\beta^2) \Rightarrow \beta^2 = 1-\gamma^{-2} \Rightarrow \beta^2=8/9$ . Thus, the velocity is $v=2c/3$ .

Plugging this into the equation for momentum, one gets $p=3/2\times \sqrt{8/9}=\sqrt{2}$ , and thus its momentum is about 1.4, as in choice (C).

Alternate Solutions

unoriginal5279
2007-04-11 09:24:43

When short on time (as I always am) I try to avoid calculations whenever possible. If you remember that E $\c^2$ = m $\c^2$ c $\c^4$ + (p c) $\c^2$ then you already know that the momentum must be less than the energy, but greater than the difference between the energy and m c $\c^2$ . This eliminates all but the correct answer.

Reply to this comment

Andresito
2006-03-29 15:15:31

You could always use the general equation,

E^2 = (p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2

Solve for p having E = 3/2, and m*c^2 = 1/2

to obtain 1.4 as in (C).

Andresito
2006-03-29 15:21:28

The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.

Andresito
2006-03-29 15:24:03

The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.

Reply to this comment

Comments

EPdropout
2012-11-08 17:12:29

I used T=p $\^2$ /2m=( $\gamma$ -1)mc $\^2$ , after finding $\gamma$ =3
=>p $\^2$ =2m*(2/3)E
=>p $\^2$ =2.0 (MeV^2/c^2)
=>p =1.4 MeV/c

Reply to this comment

rrfan
2011-11-06 17:41:09

A useful shortcut on these types of relativity problems:

The solution to $\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}$ is the following: $\beta=\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{\gamma^2}$ .

Even if you don't memorize this, it is straightforward to derive and is often useful on multiple problems, saving some time on the algebra.

Reply to this comment

dinoco
2010-11-07 07:52:37

You say that "v=2c/3." But since $\beta^2$ =8/9 then
v should be 2 $\sqrt{2}$ c/3

Reply to this comment

unoriginal5279
2007-04-11 09:24:43

apr2010
2010-04-08 12:25:33

Remarkable

thinkexist
2012-10-12 09:29:49

This is actually so simple and brilliant I cannot believe I have not thought of this before.

justin_l
2013-10-15 23:50:31

if something is remarkably brilliant, would it not be more surprising that you *do* think of it?

Reply to this comment

Andresito
2006-03-29 15:15:31

You could always use the general equation,

E^2 = (p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2

Solve for p having E = 3/2, and m*c^2 = 1/2

to obtain 1.4 as in (C).

Andresito
2006-03-29 15:21:28

The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.

Andresito
2006-03-29 15:24:03

The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.

ramparts
2009-08-06 22:54:12

Well, it's better to use in problem 70, but I think it's pretty clear that for this question, the E^2 equation takes a lot less calculation than the "official" answer.

GREview
2009-08-30 19:22:53

It may simplify things to not even think about the $c$ 's:

$E = \sqrt{p^2+m^2}$

Plugging $E=3/2$ and $m=1/2$ , we can solve for $p$ .

Albert
2009-11-05 00:32:16

Hey, I see what you did there, you used the c's in the denominator of the units right along side the values, smart work. Best solution!

Reply to this comment

Post A Comment!

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces $\alpha^2_0$ .
type this...	to get...
$\int_0^\infty$	$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$	$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$	$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$	$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$	$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$	$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$	$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$	$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$	$\frac{a}{b}$

The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...

All-Solutions List | Latest Comments | Unanswered Questions (Cries for Help!) |::| About

This site is not affiliated with ETS, nor is it officially endorsed (yet) by ETS. This site is the work of an individual named Yosun Chang. The solutions, sans user comments and ETS questions, are © 2005 by Yosun Chang except where noted. All rights reserved. / The comments appending particular solutions are due to the respective users. / Educational Testing Service, ETS, the ETS logo, Graduate Record Examinations, and GRE are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. The examination questions are © 1997 and © 2001 by ETS.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone