| 
		  
			| GR9277 #82 |  |  
			| 
		
		|  |  
		| 
			
				| Alternate Solutions |  
				| 
				| dberger8 2016-08-19 20:19:40
 | A lot like jmason86, I arrived at the answer a slightly different way.  . |  |  | jmason86 2009-09-03 19:36:44
 | I arrived at  another way. By analogy:
 ) and in the rotational system you get ) instead. Since the initial angular velocity was 0,  the delta just becomes I  = H. Some simple algebra and bam. |  |  |  
			
				| Comments |  
				| 
				| dberger8 2016-08-19 20:19:40
 | A lot like jmason86, I arrived at the answer a slightly different way.  . |  |  | asa1985 2011-10-06 09:43:46
 | Torque=dL/dt; where L is Angular Momentum;
 
 Then H=
  Troque dt H=
  dL H=L
 As we know L= Iw
 
 w=L/I
 |  |  | kroner 2009-09-26 18:13:21
 | We know  will depend on I.  The moment of inertia of a linear object like this is going to have a factor of 3 in it somewhere in terms of the mass and length, and there's no way for a factor of 3 to enter into the calculation elsewhere to cancel it out.  That leaves choice (D). |  |  | jmason86 2009-09-03 19:36:44
 | I arrived at  another way. By analogy:
 ) and in the rotational system you get ) instead. Since the initial angular velocity was 0,  the delta just becomes I  = H. Some simple algebra and bam. |  |  | Anastomosis 2008-04-09 20:51:25
 | Although the test book doesn't give the moment of inertia for a plate, it does give it for a rod--if you look at it, a plate is just a thick rod, extended in the z-direction (the direction that has no bearing on the moment of inertia). 
 Anyway,
  for a rod is  , where  is just equal to  , or  in the general case. 
 So,
 ^2 = \frac{1}{3}Md^2) |  |  | FA 2007-04-13 00:29:06
 | typo alert. there should be no 2 in the denominator of the answer in D) |  |  | i3taesun 2007-04-11 01:25:54
 | Like I=  Fdt=delta P, H=  torque dt=delta L. Therefore, we should know the changing quantity of angular momentum.
 
 |  |  | cherianjudy 2006-11-03 16:11:02
 |  |  |  | jcain6 2005-11-23 07:00:05
 | I think w = at not a/t.  This is why w = H/I right? 
											
											
											| yosun 2005-11-23 15:02:18
 | jcain6: thanks for the typo-alert; it has been corrected. (while typing up this solution, my pinky was evidently slash-key happy.) 
 |  |  |  |  
| Post A Comment! |  | You are replying to: 
 Although the test book doesn't give the moment of inertia for a plate, it does give it for a rod--if you look at it, a plate is just a thick rod, extended in the z-direction (the direction that has no bearing on the moment of inertia).
Anyway,    for a rod is   , where    is just equal to   , or    in the general case.
So,  ^2 = \frac{1}{3}Md^2) | 
        
          | Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone |  
          | LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces  . |  
          | type this... | to get... |  
          | $\int_0^\infty$ |  |  
          | $\partial$ |  |  
          | $\Rightarrow$ |  |  
          | $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |  |  
          | $\sqrt{z}$ |  |  
          | $\langle my \rangle$ |  |  
          | $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ | _{me}) |  
          | $\vec{E}$ |  |  
          | $\frac{a}{b}$ |  |  |  |  |  | 
  
    | The Sidebar Chatbox... Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...
 |  
    |  |  |