GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9277 #37
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
\prob{37}
9277_37
A $\pi^0$ meson (rest-mass energy 135 MeV) is moving with velocity $0.8c\hat{k}$ in the laboratory rest frame when it decays into two photons $\gamma_1$ and $\gamma_2$. In the $\pi^0$ rest frame, $\gamma_1$ is emitted forward and $\gamma_2$ is emitted backward relative to the $\pi^0$ direction of flight. The velocity of $\gamma_2$ in the laboratory rest frame is

  1. $-1.0c\hat{k}$
  2. $-1.2c\hat{k}$
  3. $+0.8c\hat{k}$
  4. $+1.0c\hat{k}$
  5. $+1.8c\hat{k}$

Special Relativity}Maximal Velocity

The maximal velocity of any object, even light itself, is the speed of light. Moreover, light always travels at light speed (c). This is true in all frames, and in fact, it is one of the two postulates of Special Relativity (the other being the equivalence of inertia frames).

There's no need to chunk out the addition of velocity formula for this. The only possibilities are choices (A) and (D). Since \gamma_2 is emitted backwards, according to the coordinate system in the diagram, its velocity would be -c \hat{k}, as in choice (A).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
Comments
Abou Ghazala
2018-03-11 20:16:17
\\gamma_2 is just a photon\r\nit follows from the introductory concepts that\r\n1- the speed of light is indepentant of the speed of the light source\r\n2-speed of light is the same in any inertial reference frame\r\nthese remain choices (A) and (D)\r\nthe velocity of \\gamma_1 photon is in opposite direction to that of \\gamma_2 photon\r\n\\gamma_1 photon moves in positive x-direction with speed =+1.0c\r\n\\gamma_2 photon moves in negative x-direction with speed =-1.0c as in choice (A)NEC
e2ka
2009-10-07 11:47:39
Argh! So easy, yet missed. Don't be like me and see "1.0" and "c" and quickly write down answer D, which happened to be the first 1.0c I saw...
kroner
2009-10-07 20:35:22
I did that too...
gravity
2010-11-08 00:52:04
This is frustrating and is a stupid trick done by ETS.

I was all like, "haha, ETS, you're trying to trick me with your stupid question, I'm not falling for that. BAM! D!"
Common Pitfalls
MP
2007-10-29 21:44:57
I think answer choice B should read "-0.2c"
ramparts
2009-08-09 20:25:36
This is true, but it's a non-issue, since the answer is wrong :P
NEC

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
Argh! So easy, yet missed. Don't be like me and see "1.0" and "c" and quickly write down answer D, which happened to be the first 1.0c I saw...

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...