GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR8677 #65
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
Verbatim question for GR8677 #65
Electromagnetism}Biot-Savart Law


One either remembers the field of a circular current loop or one derives it from the Bigot-Savart Law,


One finds that d\vec{l} \times \hat{r} = dl, as they're perpendicular. dB = \frac{\mu_0 I dl}{4\pi r^2}, and the vertical components of the field cancel, thus there are only the horizontal components (parallel to the axis of the ring). r is the directest distance from a differential element on the wire to a point on the axis, and x is the horizontal distance (along the axis) from the center of the ring to that point. Thus, the integral becomes,


where \int dl=2\pi b.

So anyway, the field, at a point anywhere along the axis of the loop is \vec{B}=\frac{\mu_0 I b}{2 }\frac{b}{(x^2+b^2)^{3/2}}.

At a point far, far, away, x >> b, and thus \vec{B}\approx \frac{\mu_0 I b}{2 }\frac{b}{x^3} = \frac{\mu_0 I b^2}{2 x^3}.

Set x=c, where c is the fixed coordinate of that point, to get that the field is proportional to Ib^2.


Incidentally, defining the magnetic dipole moment to be , one finds the field of a magnetic dipole to be . The field far from a current loop is the same as the field of a magnetic dipole.

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
cyberpunk
2010-09-08 15:36:55
I have a much easier solution utilizing unit analysis. Simple notice that the form of the solution is going to be of the form:rnrn(vaccum permiability)*(current)^a*(radius)^b/(distance)rnrnWhat you need to find is the values of a and b given the final result is in webers. The units are:rnrn[webers/(Amps*meters)]*(Amps)^a*(radius)^b/(meters)rnrngiven this a=1 and b=2. Voila unit analysis will save you.Alternate Solution - Unverified
ironman
2008-07-17 11:41:24
There is an even easier way to solve this problem. Far away from the current loop, the magnetic field can be considered to be that of a dipole. Recall that the dipole moment is defined by \mu=iA, where A=\pi b^{2} (the area of the current loop). So \mu=i\pi b^{2}. One can quickly see the correct answer is (B)!Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
physics_guy
2018-08-08 21:23:00
The field of a magnetic dipole is proportional to the magnetic dipole moment, which is the product of the current and the area of the loop.NEC
socolenco_
2015-11-04 15:26:47
In this problem they\'re asking for the expression of the strength of the magnetic field and using dimensional analysis we find that (D) is the only one with the right units. \r\n\r\n(B) has indeed units of magnetic dipole moment, but I don\'t see how it can be \"proportional\" to the strength of the magnetic field which has different units. The strength of the magnetic field is equal to the magnetic dipole moment over volume, isn\'t it?
GrahamS
2016-10-29 04:34:12
Dimensional analysis won\'t work here because they are asking about a proportionality. That implies that there could be constants that they are leaving out, constand that could have totally unknown units. Anyways, I think somebody who took basic E&M shouldn\'t ever forget the formula for the magnetic field outside of a wire of current, which makes this problem extremely quick, even wuicker than those that can be done with dimensional analysis.
NEC
cyberpunk
2010-09-08 15:36:55
I have a much easier solution utilizing unit analysis. Simple notice that the form of the solution is going to be of the form:rnrn(vaccum permiability)*(current)^a*(radius)^b/(distance)rnrnWhat you need to find is the values of a and b given the final result is in webers. The units are:rnrn[webers/(Amps*meters)]*(Amps)^a*(radius)^b/(meters)rnrngiven this a=1 and b=2. Voila unit analysis will save you.Alternate Solution - Unverified
511mev
2009-11-05 19:08:35
This is a logic argument for people who totally forgot everything about E&M: common sense tells us \vec{B} must be proportional to some positive powers of i and b. We know that the length of the loop (and therefore the amount of current i) increases as radius squared, so the answer must go as b^2. Only (B) has that.
signminus
2010-08-02 12:35:10
Does this actually work? If by the length of the loop you mean its circumference, it actually grows as b rather than b^2...
flyboy621
2010-11-14 22:07:45
This solution is not right (dare I say "not even wrong")? The truth is the field is proportional to the magnetic dipole moment, which is proportional to the area enclosed by the current loop.
NEC
student2008
2008-10-12 06:22:26
Actually, the solution using magnetic dipole moment is the best one, since there's nothing about the position of the fixed point in the conditions of the problem. It can even lie not on the axis of the loop.NEC
ironman
2008-07-17 11:41:24
There is an even easier way to solve this problem. Far away from the current loop, the magnetic field can be considered to be that of a dipole. Recall that the dipole moment is defined by \mu=iA, where A=\pi b^{2} (the area of the current loop). So \mu=i\pi b^{2}. One can quickly see the correct answer is (B)!
monicka1991
2011-10-06 17:22:59
great ans!! :)

tommy22222
2019-10-13 05:10:40
Brilliant answer
Alternate Solution - Unverified
jax
2005-12-03 07:26:49
It makes more sense if you say that dl \times hat{r} = dl sin \theta, and if you draw the diagram, \theta = \frac{b}{r} so the Biot-Savart law becomes,

dB =\frac{\mu_o I b dl}{4 \pi r^3}, and B = \frac{\mu_o I b}{4 \pi r^3} \int dl where \int dl = 2 \pi b

When I first read this solution I was confused as to where the extra b in the numerator comes from. It comes from the sin term in the cross product.

Man this site needs a preview option, I've got my fingers crossed that my latex code is correct and my clarification actually makes sense...

This page might make more sense than the way I typed it...

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c3
jax
2005-12-03 07:27:54
ugh that's actually sin \theta = \frac{b}{r} at the beginning. And I forgot how to do a hat on top of a letter in latex, I thought it was \hat{r} but I guess I am wrong?


jax
2005-12-03 07:28:04
Oh wait my hat worked that time :)
NEC

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
It makes more sense if you say that dl \times hat{r} = dl sin \theta, and if you draw the diagram, \theta = \frac{b}{r} so the Biot-Savart law becomes,
dB =\frac{\mu_o I b dl}{4 \pi r^3}, and B = \frac{\mu_o I b}{4 \pi r^3} \int dl where \int dl = 2 \pi b
When I first read this solution I was confused as to where the extra b in the numerator comes from. It comes from the sin term in the cross product.
Man this site needs a preview option, I've got my fingers crossed that my latex code is correct and my clarification actually makes sense...
This page might make more sense than the way I typed it...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html#c3

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...