GR0177 #43
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
QM320 2008-11-05 20:50:33 | You can also do it by brute force:
Using the given commutation relations, this is equal to
Rearranging and canceling gives choice (D).
Note: This was supposed to be an alternate solution, so I've reposted it as such. If someone could tell me how to delete my original (duplicate) comment, below, that would be helpful. :) | |
|
Comments |
QM320 2008-11-05 20:50:33 | You can also do it by brute force:
Using the given commutation relations, this is equal to
Rearranging and canceling gives choice (D).
Note: This was supposed to be an alternate solution, so I've reposted it as such. If someone could tell me how to delete my original (duplicate) comment, below, that would be helpful. :)
thisguy 2009-10-23 15:16:39 |
There's a small typo. [LxLy,Lz] = LxLyLz - LzLxLy. Not LxLyLz - LzLyLx as you wrote.
|
hybridusmanus 2010-06-15 18:06:16 |
Why can't re-associate the commutations after expansion? rnrni.e. rn[LL,L] = rnLLL - LLL =rnL(LL) - (LL)L = rnLihL - ihLL = rnih(L - L)rnrndoes this not always work?
|
walczyk 2011-04-07 08:51:16 |
Just wanted to clarify what the typo was and why it is significant. We cannot commute these orbital momentum operators willy nilly, without adding extra terms and whatnot so its a delicate procedure you could say. So beginning we have . Let's follow the original approach and try to substitute something for and . Quickly write out , rearrange to get . You can keep going with it if you'd like.
I'm curious what happens if you try to do something different.. , so we've got .
|
| | QM320 2008-11-05 20:49:13 | You can also do it by brute force:
Using the given commutation relations, this is equal to
Rearranging and canceling gives choice (D). | | Anastomosis 2008-04-10 14:20:54 | A quick way to do this:
As the commutator is ,
Use the right hand rule to point first in the +X+Y (diagonal) direction, and then curl up to the Z direction. Your thumb will be pointing in the +X-Y direction, so thus choice (D) | | bootstrap 2007-04-06 20:15:33 | The question have it setup as [AB,C] which is [AB,C] = A[B,C] + [A,C]B. Its very similar to what is posted.. | |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
|
$\partial$ |
|
$\Rightarrow$ |
|
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
|
$\sqrt{z}$ |
|
$\langle my \rangle$ |
|
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
|
$\vec{E}$ |
|
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|