GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9277 #3
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
\prob{3}
The ratio of the energies of the K characteristic x-rays of carbon (Z=6) to those of magnesium (Z=12) is most nearly

  1. 1/4
  2. 1/2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 4

Quantum Mechanics}Bohr Theory

Recall the Bohr Equation, E_n = Z^2/n^2E_1, which applies to both the Hydrogen atom and hydrogen-like atoms. One can find the characteristic X-rays from that equation (since energy is related to wavelength and frequency of the X-ray by E=\lambda f).

The ratio of energies is thus E(Z=6)/E(Z=12)=6^2/12^2=1/4, as in choice (A).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
Comments
nirav_605
2012-03-19 17:31:20
Isn't is suppose to be..

E_n = E_1 * (Z)^2/n^2

Not

E_n = Z^2/(n^2 * E_1)
NEC
Poop Loops
2008-10-05 12:40:06
Basically, you are using Moseley's Law:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model#Moseley.27s_law_and_calculation_of_K-alpha_X-ray_emission_lines


Where a K X-ray is emitted when you go from 2nd shell down to 1st shell.

So you take (Z-1)^2*(1-\frac{1}{4}) with some constant out front that will cancel to get the energy for an atom, and Z = 6 for one and Z = 12 for the other, so you get

\frac{5^2*\frac{3}{4}}{11^2*\frac{3}{4}}

And of course \frac{3}{4} cancels, so you get \frac{25}{121} which is almost 1/5, not quite the right answer, but close enough to 1/4.
NEC
Jeremy
2007-10-30 12:18:12
Typo: E=\lambda f should be E=h \nu (...though I don't see why this is needed in solving the problem).

A nice, concise background is given on Wikipedia about Moseley's " target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moseley%27s_law">Moseley's Law. In particular, the derivation section ties this back into the more familiar realm of Bohr theory.
Jeremy
2007-10-30 12:28:40
Link
Typo Alert!
Mexicana
2007-10-04 13:38:09
The way to justify the method of Yosun is to realise that K shell X-rays are produced by the transition of atomic electrons which were on the highest energy levels of that atom. These jump to the lowest level (n=1) and since 1/n^2 is small for large , one can readily neglect its contribution to the total transition energy and only account for the final level they jumped to, i.e. for NEC
Mexicana
2007-10-04 13:36:36
The way to justify the method of Yosun is to realise that K shell X-rays are produced by the transition of atomic electrons which were on the highest energy levels of that atom. These jump to the lowest level () and since is small for large , one can readily neglect its contribution to the total transition energy and only account for the final level they jumped to, i.e. for n=1NEC
Mexicana
2007-10-04 13:35:02
The way to justify the method of Yosun is to realise that K shell X-rays are produced by the transition of a atomic electron which were on the highest levels of that atom. These jump to the lowest level (n=1) and since 1/n^{2} is small for large n, one can readily neglect its contribution to the total transition energy.NEC
kolahalb
2007-09-25 11:08:54
Bohr's law fits here well.But C or, Mg are not Hydrogen like systems.Preferably we can use Moseley's law.
$\sqrt{ν}$=a(Z-b) where for K lines,b~1.
And,E=hν of course

This calculation shows that E(C)/E(Mg)=25/121
~(1/5)
Which rather matches (A)
sidharthsp
2008-10-01 21:36:27
that seems very just....

NEC

Post A Comment!
Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...