|
GR8677 #20 |
|
|
Problem
|
|
|
Special Relativity }Rest Energy
If one remembers the formulae from special relativity, arithmetic would be the hardest part of the problem.
The problem is to solve , where and .
The rest-mass of both the kaon and the proton are given in the problem. Thus, the equation reduces to .
Now, because the range of velocities vary significantly between and , one can't directly approximate that as 2. Boo. So, long-division by hand yields approximately .
The author of this site prefers to use fractions instead of decimals. Thus . Express in terms of to get .
is about 64, so the velocity has to be greater than 0.8c. The only choice left is (E).
If one has the time, one might want to memorize the following:
&=&1.005\\
\gamma(\beta=0.25)&=&1.033\\
\gamma(\beta=0.5)&=&1.155\\
\gamma(\beta=0.75)&=&1.51\\
\gamma(\beta=0.9)&=&2.29<br />
\end{eqnarray})
, or perhaps a more elaborate list of correlations.
If one knew that before-hand, then one would immediately arrive at choice (E).
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
| There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |
|
|
Comments |
nz_gre 2007-09-24 18:12:08 | why are we neglecting the fact that
^{2} + m_{0}c^{2})
And then finding the momentum velocity?
Surely, if the total kaon energy is equal to the proton rest mass then
938 = (pc) + (494) and we go from there?
bkardon 2007-10-05 13:31:04 |
The expression for is in fact equivalent to the expresssion

as follows (here is relativistic mass, is rest mass)

^2)})
^2) = m^2_0 c^4)
^2 = m^2_0 c^4)

Here I will use 

QED
|
|  | leftynm 2006-10-30 17:05:27 | This is much simpler than that.
Once you have gamma*m_k = m_p, plug in gamma = [1-(v/c)^2)]^-1, and solve for v/c. You get v/c = sqrt(1 - (m_k/m_p)^2). If you allow m_k/m_p = 1/2, which it just about is, then you get v/c = sqrt(3)/2. From seeing this so much in trig, I know sqrt(3)/2 = 0.866. Then v/c is about 0.866c. So choice E is very close.
blah22 2008-03-22 13:10:35 |
How is that not, basically, what she did? Just in more detail.
|
|  | radicaltyro 2006-10-21 12:59:15 | 1.9^2 = 3.61 = 361/100, not 262/100 |  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|