|
GR8677 #18 |
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
| There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |
|
|
Comments |
evanb 2008-06-18 17:43:24 | (A) can be eliminated based on given knowledge that V(x=0) = 0, except in the pathological b = 0 case.
(C) can be eliminated based on knowledge that the potential is harmonic.
(D) can be eliminated because an eigenfunction of the SE has a constant E, not one that varies based on position.
(E) can be eliminated based on units: just assume [E] = [ ] [ ]. Then, check if [ ] has units of 1/s.
Therefore it must be (B).
ssp 2008-09-05 03:07:22 |
Just to add to the "Elimination" time
For (C) just think about applying the to see that you can never get
For (D) you just have to look at the units after the V(x) = 0 condition is applied. You get doesn't look like an energy to me... 
For (E)... Why do we need to know about the potential for this one? ETS and useless information... kick it
|
|  | barefoot0 2006-11-14 10:32:18 | Would you not plug 0 in for x and thus V(0)-> 0 and then whatever remains on the left side must be E. Then by subtracting E when x =/ 0 gives us the V term?
In other words h^2*b^2/2m = E + V(0) = E,
E + V(x) - E = h^2*(b^2 x)^2/2m
or am I wrong? |  | transoid 2006-05-05 10:14:05 | No, there is no typo. The solution did say "This implies that the term on the left that disappeared from that substitution is the V(x) term". Thus you have to put E back in to find out V(x). |  | marshiesbudda 2006-02-20 14:00:04 | There is a typo in the solution. plugging in v(0)=0 gives you h^2*b^2/2m = E |  | tarlen 2005-11-30 21:17:28 | While this solution is very illuminating, a very quick way of solving this one is to realize that this wavefunction is a gaussian wave packet. There are only 2 potentials that give a Gaussian wave packet: one is the free particle and another is the ground state wavefunction of the harmonic oscillator potential. Since the free particle potential isn't there, we know the answer must be b), the harmonic oscillator potential.
kicksp 2007-10-29 10:29:11 |
Watch out! The given wave function is NOT a Gaussian wavepacket. And a constant potential (A) can yield "free-particle solutions": plane waves.
|
|  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|