GREPhysics.NET: GR0177 #55

GR0177 #55

Problem

GREPhysics.NET Official Solution

This problem is still being typed.

Mechanics $\Rightarrow$ }Momentum

From conservation of momentum in the horizontal direction, one has $mv = 2 m v' \cos\theta$ . Solving for the final velocity, one has $v'=\frac{v}{2\cos\theta}$ . Since $|\cos\theta| < 1$ for $\theta > 0$ , one finds that $v' > v/2$ , as in choice (E).

Alternate Solutions

carle257
2010-04-01 20:20:09

This can be done simply by acknowledging that the x momentum is conserved so $v_{x}=\frac{v}{2}$ . Then if they also have a vertical component, the speed must be greater than this value. Thus the answer must be (E).

Reply to this comment

Comments

shka
2018-07-08 19:07:34

carle257 is using symmetry instead of explicitly writing out the equations for $p_y$ and $p_x$ conservation. His answer is fine and consistent with Yosun\'s, and the fact that Quark is confused by the notation $v_x = v^\\prime cos\\theta$ makes me think he doesn\'t understand how right triangles work. You can ALWAYS solve for the components of the velocity, by definition of linear momenta $p_x = mv_x$ and $p_y = mv_y$ , and since $p_x$ and $p_y$ are conserved separately. Whether or not you choose to fuss with the angles is completely up to you. Since the angles and masses are identical, if you paid attention in PHYS 100 you can literally just read off the answer. Thanks Quark, for obfuscating a perfectly good solution with your utter misunderstanding of first principles. Maybe you should crack open Giancoli a few more times before applying to CERN, since I\'m pretty sure they like to conserve momentum linear momentum there.

Reply to this comment

aziza
2014-08-12 12:59:18

If you run the collision backward in time, you see it as two objects mass m combining into one of mass 2m, so this is inelastic. Thus the final kinetic energy of the system should be greater than initial, giving each of the two masses velocity > v/2 .

Reply to this comment

carle257
2010-04-01 20:20:09

Quark
2011-09-26 16:36:49

Linear momentum is conserved but the velocity of each of the particles in the x-direction is not $v_x$ = $\frac{v}{2}$ . This would only be true if both particles were moving along the x-axis which is certainly not the case in this problem since they've given you the angle $\theta$ .

As the solution stated, by using conservation of linear momentum in the x-direction, you can solve for the velocity of each particle (not the x-component of the velocity)
v'= $\frac{v}{2cos(\theta)}$
which includes a cos( $\theta$ ) term in the denominator. This cos( $\theta$ ) term must be less than 1 since $\theta$ must be between 0 and $\frac{\pi}{2}$ . Therefore the velocity (v) must be greater than $\frac{v}{2}$

Quark
2011-09-26 16:39:36

That last line should read "(v') must be greater than $\frac{v}{2}$ ".

FutureDrSteve
2011-11-06 14:04:33

I'm fairly certain that the x-component of each particle would in fact be v/2. It's the total velocity that is greater than v/2, thanks to the addition of the vertical component of velocity.

walczyk
2012-10-07 17:32:57

Just thinking about it, and I realize the particles can't deflect at an angle greater than 45 degrees. Since $v' = v/(2cos\theta)$ , then we look at the energy: $mv^2 /2 \ge mv^2 /(4cos^2 \theta)$

berri104
2013-10-14 05:26:49

$v'_x=v' cos \theta$

Reply to this comment

Walter
2008-09-02 14:57:08

Just a trivial matter - you need to apply conservation of momentum vertically to ascertain that because the particles move away at equal angles and have equal masses their velocities must be the same.

$mv_{1 } \, sin \theta - mv_{2} \, sin \theta = 0$

$v_{1} = v_{2}$

ramparts
2009-10-08 10:57:03

No you don't - there's symmetry. There is absolutely no reason for one direction (up or down) to be preferred. Yes, you can do the math to check, but what's the point?

Reply to this comment

Healeyx76
2006-11-02 19:41:40

another quick way is conservation of energy.

Initial energy is

$(1/2)*m*(V_0)^2$

After you have

$2*(1/2)*m*(V_f)^2$

You solve $V_f=V_0/(sqrt(2))$ which is greater than $V/2$

Mindaugas
2007-09-16 01:17:00

It is not said that collision is elastic $\Rightarrow$ energy may not be conserved.

eoliv001
2010-10-11 16:03:33

I agree. There is no mention of this being an elastic collision. You can not assume that.

Reply to this comment

Post A Comment!

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces $\alpha^2_0$ .
type this...	to get...
$\int_0^\infty$	$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$	$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$	$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$	$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$	$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$	$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$	$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$	$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$	$\frac{a}{b}$

The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...

All-Solutions List | Latest Comments | Unanswered Questions (Cries for Help!) |::| About

This site is not affiliated with ETS, nor is it officially endorsed (yet) by ETS. This site is the work of an individual named Yosun Chang. The solutions, sans user comments and ETS questions, are © 2005 by Yosun Chang except where noted. All rights reserved. / The comments appending particular solutions are due to the respective users. / Educational Testing Service, ETS, the ETS logo, Graduate Record Examinations, and GRE are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. The examination questions are © 1997 and © 2001 by ETS.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone