GR0177 #49
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |
|
Comments |
duckduck_85 2008-10-30 22:44:09 | I think it might be important to note that ETS is using the term "Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution" indistinctively from "Canonical Distribution" in this problem. Even though they do have the same mathematical form, i think it might be more appropriate to refer to this system as a system following a canonical distribution.
thatoneguy 2011-11-08 05:46:49 |
Old comment, but I don't think that's necessarily true. The Canonical Distribution doesn't have degeneracies. IIRC, it's of the form Z = . In particular, the distribution for an MB system can have degeneracies, unlike those systems which follow Fermi-Dirac statistics (which still follow the Canonical Distribution function. I believe they are using "Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution" distinctively in this case.
|
4elesta 2012-04-15 15:23:49 |
Please, can someone explain, why it's said that distribution is Maxwellian? thanks)
|
ETScustomer 2017-10-10 18:53:57 |
Maxwell also did great thermal work.
|
| |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
|
$\partial$ |
|
$\Rightarrow$ |
|
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
|
$\sqrt{z}$ |
|
$\langle my \rangle$ |
|
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
|
$\vec{E}$ |
|
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|