GR0177 #31
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
FutureDrSteve 2011-11-07 12:22:35 | Oops, this was supposed to be a separate post, not a reply....
If you realize that the ground state energy of positronium is roughly -6.8eV (which I think you have to in order to solve this problem), you don't have to do any math. An electron transitioning down from n= would have initial potential energy of 0, and drop down to final energy -6.8eV, for a max energy change of 6.8eV, eliminating (C), (D), and (E). Since the electron is only falling down from n=3, it stands to reason that the photon would be less energetic than 6.8eV, leaving only answer (A). | |
|
Comments |
bill92 2014-10-27 13:17:41 | I just took the exam and there was no positronium question! All my studying was for naught!
Just kidding, I think it went well. Thanks to Yosun for this very helpful site! | | FutureDrSteve 2011-11-07 12:22:35 | Oops, this was supposed to be a separate post, not a reply....
If you realize that the ground state energy of positronium is roughly -6.8eV (which I think you have to in order to solve this problem), you don't have to do any math. An electron transitioning down from n= would have initial potential energy of 0, and drop down to final energy -6.8eV, for a max energy change of 6.8eV, eliminating (C), (D), and (E). Since the electron is only falling down from n=3, it stands to reason that the photon would be less energetic than 6.8eV, leaving only answer (A). | | Tommy Koulax 2007-10-31 17:48:57 | Why is the reduced mass m/2 ?
nick1234 2007-11-02 17:16:11 |
For the hydrogen atom, dominates the denominator, and becomes
For positronium, , so
|
| | rinnie 2007-03-26 21:27:49 | Hydrogen levels E3 - E1 = -1.5 + 13.6 = 12.1/2 = 6.05.
Energy level of positronium is half those of Hydrogen.
FutureDrSteve 2011-11-07 12:20:53 |
If you realize that the ground state energy of positronium is roughly -6.8eV (which I think you have to in order to solve this problem), you don't have to do any math. An electron transitioning down from n= would have initial potential energy of 0, and drop down to final energy -6.8eV, for a max energy change of 6.8eV, eliminating (C), (D), and (E). Since the electron is only falling down from n=3, it stands to reason that the photon would be less energetic than 6.8eV, leaving only answer (A).
|
| |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
|
$\partial$ |
|
$\Rightarrow$ |
|
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
|
$\sqrt{z}$ |
|
$\langle my \rangle$ |
|
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
|
$\vec{E}$ |
|
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|