GR0177 #31
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
FutureDrSteve 2011-11-07 12:22:35 | Oops, this was supposed to be a separate post, not a reply....
If you realize that the ground state energy of positronium is roughly -6.8eV (which I think you have to in order to solve this problem), you don't have to do any math. An electron transitioning down from n= would have initial potential energy of 0, and drop down to final energy -6.8eV, for a max energy change of 6.8eV, eliminating (C), (D), and (E). Since the electron is only falling down from n=3, it stands to reason that the photon would be less energetic than 6.8eV, leaving only answer (A). | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dbb0/2dbb0a6359f9a33822a5b44305261c318eb3541b" alt="Alternate Solution - Unverified" |
|
Comments |
bill92 2014-10-27 13:17:41 | I just took the exam and there was no positronium question! All my studying was for naught!
Just kidding, I think it went well. Thanks to Yosun for this very helpful site! | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44870/44870523a04b283b965cd8ae9c7ca868d7c42985" alt="NEC" | FutureDrSteve 2011-11-07 12:22:35 | Oops, this was supposed to be a separate post, not a reply....
If you realize that the ground state energy of positronium is roughly -6.8eV (which I think you have to in order to solve this problem), you don't have to do any math. An electron transitioning down from n= would have initial potential energy of 0, and drop down to final energy -6.8eV, for a max energy change of 6.8eV, eliminating (C), (D), and (E). Since the electron is only falling down from n=3, it stands to reason that the photon would be less energetic than 6.8eV, leaving only answer (A). | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dbb0/2dbb0a6359f9a33822a5b44305261c318eb3541b" alt="Alternate Solution - Unverified" | Tommy Koulax 2007-10-31 17:48:57 | Why is the reduced mass m/2 ?
nick1234 2007-11-02 17:16:11 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4f62/c4f62e412a5ceeb1d4fb5203213363fa2e4cdb5f" alt="\mu = \frac{m_{1} \times m_{2}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}"
For the hydrogen atom, dominates the denominator, and becomes data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c91b9/c91b9d758167e23db054369f722a40680b2ed955" alt="\frac{m_{e} \times m_{p}}{m_{p}} = m_{e}"
For positronium, , so data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dc22/2dc22f7757f70ca3c3f706e1f7b973bff61594ef" alt="\mu = \frac{m_{e}^{2}}{2 m_{e}} = \frac{m_{e}}{2}"
|
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44870/44870523a04b283b965cd8ae9c7ca868d7c42985" alt="NEC" | rinnie 2007-03-26 21:27:49 | Hydrogen levels E3 - E1 = -1.5 + 13.6 = 12.1/2 = 6.05.
Energy level of positronium is half those of Hydrogen.
FutureDrSteve 2011-11-07 12:20:53 |
If you realize that the ground state energy of positronium is roughly -6.8eV (which I think you have to in order to solve this problem), you don't have to do any math. An electron transitioning down from n= would have initial potential energy of 0, and drop down to final energy -6.8eV, for a max energy change of 6.8eV, eliminating (C), (D), and (E). Since the electron is only falling down from n=3, it stands to reason that the photon would be less energetic than 6.8eV, leaving only answer (A).
|
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44870/44870523a04b283b965cd8ae9c7ca868d7c42985" alt="NEC" |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/021b0/021b08a19191e39be8519171ef8a6d7ea9af9ed5" alt="" |
$\partial$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/483e0/483e00d014fc3d48bfdce45ecc51d1225c23ecd6" alt="" |
$\Rightarrow$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d236c/d236cde738358c80955189758056a80971679bcf" alt="" |
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d9d0/8d9d0442f3052c71f3286c9dcb1e8316a6cab7d8" alt="" |
$\sqrt{z}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f18e2/f18e295c55496e63802befa6a312ec206fb2cb0f" alt="" |
$\langle my \rangle$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa4fb/aa4fb0f5713c4845fc453a003296f712565152b2" alt="" |
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30078/30078eab024480919eab08cc12d07ec80d6ecb21" alt=""_{me}) |
$\vec{E}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6714b/6714b55354eb8b5001278b4723dc5399e9ef7211" alt="" |
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9042/c90423855ce42b400585a07ec1063b98650df943" alt="" |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|