|
GR9277 #93 |
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
jburkart 2007-11-02 00:23:15 | A real way to do the problem is as follows. Kinetic energy is , where is the length of the string; potential is . Setting the Lagrangian to , Lagrange's equation is . In our case and we find , which then yields . But this is only the acceleration along the direction of motion; there is also a perpendicular centripetal acceleration given by . To find we can invoke conservation of energy: , so , so the centripetal acceleration is .
Taking the norm of the the two acceleration components, we get , answer (E).
A common mistake would be to omit the calculation of the centripetal acceleration, which would yield an incorrect answer of , which ETS kindly does not give as an option. |  |
|
|
Comments |
jburkart 2007-11-02 00:23:15 | A real way to do the problem is as follows. Kinetic energy is , where is the length of the string; potential is . Setting the Lagrangian to , Lagrange's equation is . In our case and we find , which then yields . But this is only the acceleration along the direction of motion; there is also a perpendicular centripetal acceleration given by . To find we can invoke conservation of energy: , so , so the centripetal acceleration is .
Taking the norm of the the two acceleration components, we get , answer (E).
A common mistake would be to omit the calculation of the centripetal acceleration, which would yield an incorrect answer of , which ETS kindly does not give as an option. |  | kb 2007-10-28 22:49:32 | is E is correct, can someone explain why
a(pi/2) = sqrt(3+1)g = 2g?
kb 2007-10-29 16:52:27 |
sorry, typo
"if E is correct, can someone explain why a(pi/2) = sqrt(3+1)g = 2g?"
and should go under "help!"
|
jburkart 2007-11-02 00:25:23 |
Because at that point the mass is experiencing a lot of g's! Try swinging in a swing sometime--you feel a lot of acceleration at the bottom.
|
evanb 2008-06-26 19:26:17 |
At the top, the energy is , and at the bottom it is .
This leaves us with , and , but , so .
|
|  | rmyers 2006-12-01 13:29:01 | The first four words should be edited out of this solution.
lambda 2007-10-21 22:13:29 |
I agree. This test can't be finished in the time allowed if one tries to apply "rigorous physics"!
|
|  | Andresito 2006-03-30 12:05:12 | Thank you for the advice. :) |  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|